Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 15:18:29 GMT 10
A five-year period separates us from that embarrassing event that starred Susana Díaz Pacheco , who became a peculiar Attila in the kingdom of Ferraz. The former president defended, linked to the economistic metaphysics of austerity, the continuity in power of the right-wing carpetovetónica, the meager interests of the Ibex 35 and the baronies and Chinese vases of that small, but influential, dynastic and conservative PSOE that deconstructs the ideology and values in favor of a changed pragmatism. They were critical days for Spanish socialism thanks to the insolence of Díaz who had believed what were nothing but imitations of a non-existent reality. For the progressive sociology of the country, the dry Peronism that the former Andalusian president put into circulation as a prop for her political action was illegible; Her organic control, as seen in the primaries, was not what Díaz assumed and she was not who she thought or who they told her she was. Without the burden of the oligarchic faction of his own.
Party, Pedro Sánchez has managed to make Obama's famous phrase his own after winning the US elections: “it is the answer to those who for a long time were cynical and doubted what we could achieve, of “put your hands on the arc of History and bend it as a hope for a better future.” It was almost axiomatic that the legislator had conceived the motion of censure so that it Australia Phone Number would not be won and that it was used as an instrument to wear down the government but never to overthrow it until Sánchez established an alternative majority to that of the Popular Party. It might seem that a parliamentary weight of a disruptive identity nature with respect to the political regime, such as that which supports the executive, would generate instability in public life, which, however, not only has not been the case, but on the contrary, there have been undertaken serious and extraordinary problems with an enviable.
Political and institutional balance. Perhaps this is because this majority represents real Spain, historical and contemporary, with its real problems and clamorous dissent. There is no doubt that Pedro Sánchez is managing a particularly complicated historical moment with perspective and proactivity, in the face of an outdated and clumsy right incapable of assuming any type of institutional or political responsibility and dedicated to dialectical aggression or personal insult. However, now Sánchez has the task of organically finishing off the architecture of a PSOE that has truly learned from those events, especially in Andalusia, where Susana Díaz has carried out an infinite trench resistance. Perhaps what the former Andalusian president should have faced was something more than a comfortable retirement in the Senate due to the seriousness of what she undertook. On the other hand, all the power of Andalusian socialism will be accumulated by Juan Espadas, mayor of Seville, and the one chosen at the time by Díaz to take over institutional power in Seville. It is possible that Sanchismo in Andalusia is yet to be done.
Party, Pedro Sánchez has managed to make Obama's famous phrase his own after winning the US elections: “it is the answer to those who for a long time were cynical and doubted what we could achieve, of “put your hands on the arc of History and bend it as a hope for a better future.” It was almost axiomatic that the legislator had conceived the motion of censure so that it Australia Phone Number would not be won and that it was used as an instrument to wear down the government but never to overthrow it until Sánchez established an alternative majority to that of the Popular Party. It might seem that a parliamentary weight of a disruptive identity nature with respect to the political regime, such as that which supports the executive, would generate instability in public life, which, however, not only has not been the case, but on the contrary, there have been undertaken serious and extraordinary problems with an enviable.
Political and institutional balance. Perhaps this is because this majority represents real Spain, historical and contemporary, with its real problems and clamorous dissent. There is no doubt that Pedro Sánchez is managing a particularly complicated historical moment with perspective and proactivity, in the face of an outdated and clumsy right incapable of assuming any type of institutional or political responsibility and dedicated to dialectical aggression or personal insult. However, now Sánchez has the task of organically finishing off the architecture of a PSOE that has truly learned from those events, especially in Andalusia, where Susana Díaz has carried out an infinite trench resistance. Perhaps what the former Andalusian president should have faced was something more than a comfortable retirement in the Senate due to the seriousness of what she undertook. On the other hand, all the power of Andalusian socialism will be accumulated by Juan Espadas, mayor of Seville, and the one chosen at the time by Díaz to take over institutional power in Seville. It is possible that Sanchismo in Andalusia is yet to be done.